Read firstPractice-changingEvidence update

Comment on: “Time to Vasopressor Initiation Is Not Associated With Increased Mortality in Patients With Septic Shock”

Annals of Emergency Medicine1 Jul 2026Shock

Don't feel pressured by literature suggesting that every minute counts for vasopressor start time; the evidence here suggests that simply delaying initiation isn't inherently more dangerous. Focus instead on achieving adequate hemodynamic targets and addressing underlying sources of shock, rather than optimizing the clock time of pressor placement. Always remember this is observational data from a real-world setting.

EDCritix summary

Black et al. published an analysis using a large, contemporary real-world cohort to tackle the long-standing question surrounding the optimal timing for initiating vasopressors in septic shock. Their study found that the time elapsed until vasopressor administration is not associated with increased all-cause mortality in this patient population. This finding challenges some of the more aggressive guidelines suggesting very early initiation might confer a survival benefit. The authors utilized robust multivariable modeling on data from a regional data trust, lending weight to their conclusion regarding timing independence.